View Single Post
Old 11-09-2014, 04:12 PM   #1588
m3thods
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
m3thods's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
the newer ones will have IS, the older ones do not.

Generally, 3rd party lenses from Sigma and Tamron will carry less resale value (and a higher depreciation rate) compared to OEM lenses.

With that, the Tamron 17-50 is a cult classic among crop shooters. The newer Sigma 17-50 (with IS) is the best lens in its class, for far less than the Canon/Nikon equivalents (17-55s).

You can't really go wrong. If you save up, you'll be getting a high quality OEM lens. If you choose Sigma and Tamron, you get a great lens at a great price. It all depends on where you want to put your cash.

If you can find one, I had a Sigma 18-50 2.8 "macro". I loved that lens to death and only got rid of it to fund a Canon 10-22. The close focusing distance (while not a true 1:1 macro) really gets you close-up photos without breaking the bank. It was my go-to when shooting crop while I had it.
m3thods is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: