Thread: Interstellar
View Single Post
Old 11-16-2014, 02:13 AM   #26
StylinRed
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,694
Thanked 10,397 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
1. expected the use of Imax cameras, space, exploration, etc. would mean excellent cinematography, but Nope. Instead we get constant close-ups/tight spaces/and lazy CGI

2. the constant attempt at making the undramatic, excessively dramatic was annoying (the docking sequences come to mind; his son returning to the farm for two)

3. you know what's coming right from the beginning but it took about 2.5hours before we got to it and the movie actually started before then it was just mind numbingly needless time wasting (see #2)

4. the last 30mins? was acceptable at best, kinda lame, but compared to the rest of it it was great

5. Matthew was good and I liked the casting of his daughters they performed well and actually looked like one another (the role of his son seemed completely needless)

not really but kind of a spoiler? so spoilered
Spoiler!


When the lights came on in the theatre (20% full) it looked like everyone was jarred awake by the lights and groggily got up and labouriously made their way down the steps

All in all disappointed but it passed the time.


4/10



I suspect a lot of the love is due to Christopher Nolan fans

Last edited by StylinRed; 11-16-2014 at 02:18 AM.
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by: