Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin
Hey, don't get all butthurt on me. Read what I wrote about where I learned it, before you start spewing your rage.
|
I did read what you wrote, and frankly your friends stupid opinion became your stupid opinion when you decided to walk out of a restaurant without paying for the food you consumed. So I don't give a shit where you learned it, in fact if anything it makes it worse that you blindly just trust your friend without any sort of common sense as to how idiotic what your friend has said.
My buddy went to Civil Engineering, does that mean I should blindly trust him on how to build the new Massey Bridge?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin
If you're deciding not to pay, obviously you're not going to be cocky about it. Like I said, many many people don't have the decency or immoral to eat, complain and leave, so chill out bro. It is what it is.
|
Right so the difference between theft and what your doing, is the fact that you aren't cocky about it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin
It is what it is.
|
Such a stupid saying, of course it is what it is, until it isn't. Then it's something else, and that something else is called theft.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin
What do you mean "but I would still have to legally pay for the meal"? If you walk into a restaurant, ordered a meal, and it didn't come as described on the menu, you would pay for it? If they served your food on a plunger, used condoms, used panties, you'd still pay for it?
|
You tell me the last time you were served a meal on a bed of condoms, and I'll tell you the last time I paid for such a meal. What a stupid example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin
However, customers have the right to return products for full refund within 2 years of purchasing product unless there is written agreement that states the duration of refund/exchange or no refund/exchange.
|
The first factual thing you have said... and your fucking wrong. There is no such period. In fact the store can deny you a refund even if you never leave the store with the product, as long as it doesn't go against their policies. The only exception to this is that if the products were found to be defective.
In which case if you refer yourself to here:
CBA British Columbia - 257
It clearly explains that:
1. There is no set period for defective goods, only what is considered "reasonable".
2. The store has every right to reject your return and not issue a refund. In which case it is your responsibility to submit that shit IN WRITING, and if that goes nowhere and they still reject your ass, you basically have to sue to get your money back. You will probably win, if you actually have a case, but I'm willing to bet that if it ever made it this far, you likely won't have a winning case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin
Whether buying products at a mall or getting service from a restaurant, the same rule applies for customers. Eating at a restaurant, and later discovering that there is something wrong with the food, is similar to getting a full refund.
|
No its not, because at the moment you realized your food was inadequate it was your duty and responsibility to cease using (eating the food in this case), and report it to the manager. If you had a hair in your food, you don't eat the meal around it, then leave without paying because there was a hair in your food.