Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar
The Hobbit 3. Legit 7/10, not RS 7/10. Better than the hobbit 2.
as I think most people say regarding all 3 of the movies, LOTR made the Hobbit incapable of having the same wow factor it would otherwise.
SEMI-SPOILER.
The last like, hour, of the movie after *someone* died, could have not been there. So damn long. The 3 movies could have been jammed into 2 movies. You could tell Peter Jackson stretched the 2 movies into 3.
|
Really? I thought 2 was better, but I figured 3 wouldn't be as good going in because they'd be wrapping everything up at the end like ROTK (which had a similar hour long, dragged out ending). Actual content-wise 3 didn't have much in it but I'm guessing they split it for the extended versions later on (otherwise they'd have two 3-3.5hr long movies extended to 5 hours each).
Also I now have a hard time watching LOTR, I watched the first half of Fellowship and I can get past the 1 year older SFX but I feel like Frodo should have been portrayed closer to the way Bilbo is in The Hobbit.