Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS
Provide some for this current campaign.
If you're referring to the Engage Canada ads, I wouldn't call them slam ads or attack ads. They're more stating facts than attacking the leader of the party.
There's a difference between saying "he has great hair but being PM isn't an entry level position" vs. providing facts and sources followed by an opinion.
Some ads from Engage are here:
Engage Canada's anti-Harper ad run could get cut short - Politics - CBC News |
either you are extremely biased, or extremely blind. You can call harpers 'attacks' on trudeau as stating facts as well. They take a video clip of trudeau talking about what his policy will be (providing fact and source), which is why they say he's not ready (follow with an opinion). That fits 100% of your very own criteria as being informational.
You want an attack ad? here:
advertising works. that's why its there. power to whomever can convince the most sheep to vote for them.