Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore
Ok, so what part of the constitution is this in violation of? If you're going to make that suggestion please back it up.
I'm leaving it here, it's the section 2 from most arguments.
Charters
He has a dual citizenship unless the article I read was wrong.
He's not a dual citizen. According to Harpie, the subject *should* be eligible for Pakistani citizenship given the fact his parents were from there 30yrs ago. He's born and raised in Canada. Unfortunately, the bill (c-24) was written in a way that such condition is enough to grant gov't power to strip citizenship
We're talking about the rights of people with multiple citizenships who are convicted terrorists, last I checked acts of terrorism aren't particularly Canadian things to do. The only "expansion" I've heard of so far is to include other people who have moved here, have a dual citizenship, and have been convicted of a serious crime. That seems like a reasonable enough response to someone who has brought nothing but a negative impact to Canada. |
The argument is that the bill itself is not fair. In this particular case, you want to kick him out of Canada because he's eligible to another citizenship. What if this terrorist were a Canadian pure and simple? Does that change your opinion about whether he should be deported and strip of citizenship?
If so, do explain.
If not, then you are on the same ground. You think bill C24 was BS.