I know, it's just absolute bullshit.
The problem is, how far will they go if they're successful with the 10/22 mag limits?
I know that 10rd LAR and Beowolf mags are going to be next. Then bullpups? I've heard that rumor, and it has teeth because of the way the bureaucrats view bullpups.
Quote:
|
"Any rifle, shotgun or carbine stock of the type known as the “bull-pup” design, being a stock that, when combined with a firearm, reduces the overall length of the firearm such that a substantial part of the reloading action or the magazine-well is located behind the trigger of the firearm when it is held in the normal firing position."[26] (i.e.: only removable stocks are prohibited by this regulation, fixed-stock firearms such as the FN P90 and IWI Tavor are excluded)
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Canada
They are very clear that you cannot alter a gun like a 10/22 by mounting it in a bullpup stock. That has been made clear by the CBSA in years past. Plus as the Swiss Arms/CZ858 fiasco showed us, exclusions to the law can be changed overnight.