REVscene Automotive Forum - View Single Post

bokch0y · 09-25-2016, 05:48 AM

my brother has a 2012 with the fsport package. He's left it with me for weeks on end, so although I don't own one, i am well versed with the CT.

Everything Hardboiler says is correct. I'd also like to add that although the CT is great mileage wise in the city, the cvt transmission makes it horrible on the highway from what I've experienced. It revs much higher therefore the fuel consumption is a bit worse.

Also like to add, for me, the interior also feels quite cheap and the finish is not that of a typical Lexus, so for me the overall package is a deal breaker. I do like the styling overall though. If they mated the CT with the 2.5 or sledge hammered in the 3.5L engines, I'd easily overlook its shortcomings and buy one.

09-25-2016, 05:48 AM	#4
bokch0y Proud to be called a RS Regular! Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: YYC/YVR Posts: 112 Thanked 128 Times in 31 Posts Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts	my brother has a 2012 with the fsport package. He's left it with me for weeks on end, so although I don't own one, i am well versed with the CT. Everything Hardboiler says is correct. I'd also like to add that although the CT is great mileage wise in the city, the cvt transmission makes it horrible on the highway from what I've experienced. It revs much higher therefore the fuel consumption is a bit worse. Also like to add, for me, the interior also feels quite cheap and the finish is not that of a typical Lexus, so for me the overall package is a deal breaker. I do like the styling overall though. If they mated the CT with the 2.5 or sledge hammered in the 3.5L engines, I'd easily overlook its shortcomings and buy one.