Quote:
Originally Posted by Infiniti
|
If I were the landlord dude, I would totally be consulting a lawyer now and looking to see if I can sue. It isn't a matter of cost recovery -- that part of the bargain has already been covered by the City (of Ottawa) now that the problem has come to light. It is a matter of vindication, a matter of holding the responsible party responsible for their share of the bargain so that similar shxt shows wouldn't happen again. The municipal government, the Salvation Army, the Canadian Mental Health Association would all be named, esp with the Salvation Army since they explicitly made the claim for a minimum 1 home visit per week.
It is shxt like this that makes me lose faith in humanity. You try to be nice and do the right thing for the greater good, only to end up getting a$$raped.