Quote:
Originally Posted by GG
Now even if ken wasnt doing 140km, even 80km direct hit (no brake) can kill the doc that decides to turn left whenever he wants. Especially in a old economic box that lacks all the safety feature a modern car has today? Hell ya, just look at the crash test and we come back and discuss. 70-80km direct "SIDE" impact can kill a senior/or anyone with a poor health condition, you never know. im sure if he got ram over by a larger SUV doing 70-80km on the side, he probably wouldnt survive either
|
Hey moron, you realize he got hit in the PASSENGER side right? He unquestionably would have survived this accident if he was hit at 80km/h... but he got killed despite the complete opposite side of his vehicle from him getting hit... that tells you something about the responsibility of the person that hit him and the speed they were going. How do I know that? I was primary witness on a Nissan 350Z hitting a 1978 Honda Civic in the passenger side after the Civic went through a red light and the 350Z was travelling at 70km/h without even hitting his brakes... the driver of that Civic not only survived, he got out of his shitty old econobox and was walking around. Also, the Audi is like 5 years older than the Suzuki... I guess with your logic and that old-ass Audi's shitty technology (haha) Ken should have died twice. Too bad he didn't.
No one in this thread is saying anyone has the right to turn left in front of anybody, everyone is saying that you don't have the right to drive 140km/h (that's nearly 3 times the speed limit to help you out here) in the city with complete impunity when you take someone's life because of it.
How you can't see that is beyond human explanation.