|
Uh the conclusion of the Site C review was that we’re fucked with any of the 3 options (continue, delay, or halt), and continuing and halting the project were basically a wash in terms of loss (with delaying being by far the worst option).
How you interpreted that as we were better off to just go ahead and finish it is incredible (well, it would be if you actually read the review). The review basically said it shouldn’t have been done to begin with as it relied far too heavily on as yet to be built LNG plants (3 minimum required to justify the project).
|