Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar
The goal hasn't been a 30 foot concrete wall for 2000miles for a long time, stop pretending it is.
If manic says anything less than a full wall is a lose for welfare then I would say anything more than $20 towards a wall is a loss for manic.
Edit: what am I even doing here. I need for remove RS from my bookmarks this place is ridiculous.
|
It's got nothing to do with the structure. He could plant tulips along the southern border and I'd win.
It's about the funding. He and i both know that.
So long as barrier is put where it didn't exist before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic!
If the wall gets funded you win if I doesn't I win. Anything above 2.8 bill for a new wall you win any thing below I win. New wall not repairs or beefing up the existing walls/gates/fences etc. Same 6 month ban. None of this draw B.S.
|
Now we're talking.
We have a deal.