Quote:
Originally Posted by welfare
|
...not sure if serious. Saying he isn't impeached because they haven't delivered the findings to the senate is like saying I haven't been laid off since my two-week notice came yesterday.
Also, I like how you left out the rest of the article.
Quote:
“If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all,” Mr. Feldman wrote for Bloomberg.
Should the House indefinitely delay sending its findings to the Senate, “then Trump could say with strong justification that he was never actually impeached,” Mr. Feldmanadded.
“And that’s probably not the message Congressional Democrats are hoping to send,” he concluded.
Mr. Feldman, a law professor at Harvard University, was chosen by Democrats to testify during the first public impeachment hearing held this month by the House Judiciary Committee.
Appearing before Congress on Dec. 4, Mr. Feldman said he believed that Mr. Trump “committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors by corruptly abusing the office of the presidency.”
The Democratic-controlled House subsequently voted Tuesday to pass articles of impeachment against Mr. Trump for both abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California has not yet committed to sending those articles to the Senate, however, where Mr. Trump is likely to be acquitted at trial by its Republican majority.
|
Also, I thought you guys don't believe anything in WaPo? Is that only when it doesn't meet your agenda?