View Single Post
Old 10-26-2020, 07:49 PM   #6508
spoon.ek9
JDMEK9Mod | DogWhisperer
 
spoon.ek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,300
Thanked 7,181 Times in 2,434 Posts
Failed 108 Times in 68 Posts
Hehe, you need to understand what it means when it comes to droplet precautions. Limited capacity in restaurants does in fact mitigate risk of transmission. Droplet particles can only travel so far (hence the 6ft rule). Obviously if it's a tiny enclosed space then no one should be dining in at those particular restaurants nor should they be allowed to serve in-store. If you're in a large enough place with tables that have sufficient distance, your risk is quite low. Is it ideal? of course not. But you can bet that the restaurant industry would rather operate at limited capacity instead of 0%.

You're looking at this from a political stand point and quite frankly you shouldn't be. Look at the science, not the vague possibility that it's all just for show. It's easy to be cynical. Try looking at the scientific side of things instead.
__________________
1998 Honda Civic EK9 - GQ || 1990 Honda Civic Si ED7 - DD || 1990 Honda Civic ED6 - RIP
VCC Buy/Sell rating 60-0-0 || RS Buy/Sell rating 20-0-0 || HT Buy/Sell rating 1-0-0
IG: @spoon.ek9
Spoiler!
spoon.ek9 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: