[Manic!]

Originally Posted by GS8

Let me preface this by reiterating that I have no political leanings particularly in US politics where it becomes so polarizing that to even dare call yourself a centrist would oust you from both groups like you were an X-Men member with less purpose than Longneck.

I should also point out that this isn’t about Donald Trump winning his lawsuit; it’s about determining whether or not the most important process in any free country was compromised. This isn’t exactly like 2016 where many automatically blamed an outside power for upheaving the process (you know, 4 years’ worth of conspiracy theories). Not quite. This is about whether the system itself was corrupted by select people for a grand purpose. Should a society not want to examine the data and assess how many admissible votes were not counted as well as how many inadmissible votes were?

Some general issues that were brought up (some through sworn affidavits

and the earth is flat, just look at all the evidence on youtube.

Most of the voter fraud evidence is flimsy b.s.



https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ll-for-inquiry

A postal worker whose allegations of ballot tampering are the basis of Republican calls for investigations has reportedly recanted his story.

Democrats on the House oversight committee said that Richard Hopkins – the worker who claimed in a signed affidavit that a supervisor at the US Postal Service (USPS) in Erie, Pennsylvania, instructed staff to tamper with ballots by backdating ones that arrived late – had recanted the allegations in an interview with investigators for the USPS Inspector General.

Investigators told the committee that Hopkins “did not explain why he signed a false affidavit”, the committee wrote in a statement.

Hopkins admitted to fabricating his claims, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday, citing three officials. After he submitted the affidavit, the South Carolina Republican senator Lindsay Graham, who heads the Senate judiciary committee, called for a federal investigation.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1719801.html

At his bizarre press conference outside Four Seasons Total Landscaping in Philadelphia, Rudy Giuliani called up several witnesses to testify of alleged irregularities at vote-counting facilities – and one, it turns out, is a convicted sex offender.

Poll watcher Darryl Mikell Brooks was convicted in the 1990s of sexual assault, lewdness and endangering the welfare of a minor. He was charged with exposing himself to two girls aged seven and 11, although he has always maintained his innocence.

He has unsuccessfully stood for office in Trenton, New Jersey on multiple occasions, and was apparently recognised at the press conference by the city’s mayor, Reed Gusciora, who told the site of his reaction: “Here’s New Jersey’s perennial candidate claiming to live in Philadelphia and Giuliani claiming him to be a poll watcher and Philadelphia resident."

with 140 plus million ballots being cast you are going to have some irregularities but that does not mean it was voter fraud.