View Single Post
Old 03-06-2021, 06:45 AM   #4860
CorneringArtist
"Entertainment" mod.
 
CorneringArtist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 5,124
Thanked 3,465 Times in 1,056 Posts
Failed 161 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68style View Post
On the Facebook group, all the guys going to their court dates now are running into crooked ass judges telling them to buy Tesla's or Prius and entering their personal bias into the record of the "trial" rather than judgement based on the law.

Such a rigged system. It's going to come back and bite them though, the one guy where the judge told him cars like his are useless and that he himself drives a Prius, that guy owns a Lambo and paid the massive fee to get the transcripts of his case and is taking it to the Supreme Court.
It's reasonable apprehension of bias, which can be motioned for in Canadian court. The precedence exists. See R v S (RD) [1997] where racial bias was implied in the sentencing of a black youth. There's also a hint of disparaging social class, as some people cannot feasibly afford those vehicles, let alone charge a Tesla.
__________________
Green OJ Special
CorneringArtist is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by: