That's funny and all, but the part that I quoted was the pandering I was pointing out, and he did say that.
Again with the "but this part is wrong" argument to try and dismantle the parts that weren't wrong. If someone says 2+2 is 4 and 3+3 is 7 in the same statement, its doesn't mean 2+2 is no longer 4.
It also says this in the article.
Quote:
|
A Twitter account purporting to be organizers of a Canada Day convoy protest on Parliament Hill suggested Tuesday they had spoken to the Poilievre campaign and the leadership candidate planned to meet them at the rally – a claim the Poilievre campaign flatly denied Tuesday.
|