[westopher]

I’d hardly say using a mass gun casualty to enact gun laws is a political agenda more than it is about public safety. The motivation behind it is for the sake of public protection. I will concede that if it puts public safety or conclusions of an investigation at risk then it’s poorly thought out, however, the gunman was dead, no safety risks would have been posed, and the saying “the end justifies the means” rings true.
Finger pointing from a disorganized RCMP investigation is nothing new, and the fact is that liberals aren’t trying to put in gun laws because they like it and think it’s fun.