Thread: Parental Thread
View Single Post
Old 11-11-2022, 03:32 PM   #670
!Aznboi128
Media Officer / MOD
 
!Aznboi128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,088
Thanked 5,771 Times in 1,733 Posts
Failed 86 Times in 64 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by inv4zn View Post
Numbers mean diddly-squat, the rear passenger can have 40" of legroom, but it doesn't mean anything if the front passenger has to sit with their kneecaps in the glovebox with the seat angled at 70 degrees.

The CX5 really isn't a big car.
^ This.

A lot of those 360 seats pushes the base towards the front of the vehicle then you got the tilt it means there's minimal space.

The CX-5 is tight, similar to the Rav4 it can barely fit a normal RF seat.
Here's a Foonf at the right recline in the CX-5.


and this was how much space in front


It's hard to see but that's tight.

a CX-50 is better
__________________
[NS]NiteShadow
my feedback (128-0-0)
Revscene Automotive Reviews
Quick link to personal reviews -> Website YouTube
Official Revscene Instagram Coordinator
!Aznboi128 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: