If WFH was only listed as temporary then it's a poor assumption to make, but it's no different from people in the private sector who did the same thing.
That said, if 60% of them having been working from home just fine then mandating them back into the office with no reason given sounds like someone trying to justify paying for office space that they don't really need or someone in middle management hoping nobody notices they don't provide any actual value. Having people in an office for the sake of having them in an office is stupid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby
The ability to WFH has always been a privilege, and temporary.
|
Depends on the job/agreement. I'm fully work from home and if the company I work for tried to force everyone to go in the company would fall apart because a ton of us are nowhere near the offices. I'm a 7 hour drive from the Canadian office lol.