Quote:
Originally Posted by inv4zn
I think it's generally already known, and I haven't worked with ALL of them.
That said, the really shitty ones will go as far as to set up "Project Management Services" paper companies to oversee the construction. They're essentially paper companies with like 3 employees, and the fact that they're owned in whole or in part by the developer is often not publicly available.
This distances the developer from potential lawsuits, and gives the illusion that there's no conflicts of interest when awarding scopes.
|
For those of us not in the industry, generally who are the good developers and who are the ones to avoid?