05-13-2023, 01:35 AM
|
#4824
|
|
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,695
Thanked 10,397 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
|
Do you guys prefer Organic food? Well you may not be able to find it in the future as Canada has relaxed the rules regarding gene edited Seeds and they will place oversight in the hands of the industry instead thru voluntarily provided details by corporations
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/gene-...ears-1.6836623
Quote:
On May 3, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Marie-Claude Bibeau announced that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) seed guidelines now allow for some modified plants.
The updated seed rules now allow seeds created through gene-editing that are not spliced with foreign DNA or altered to make them pesticide-resistant.
These seeds will be allowed without an independent safety assessment by the government, as they are already considered safe.
Canada also announced an industry-managed database — the Seeds Canada Canadian Variety Transparency Database — to make it clear which seeds are and are not organic. While that database is voluntary, Bibeau says it will be overseen by a steering committee that includes and protects organic producers.
But Squires and other organic farmers say mandatory reporting is needed to know exactly which seeds take root. And with no labelling requirements, consumers won't know which foods use gene-edited ingredients. That, they say, could jeopardize the $9-billion organic sector, which must meet strict criteria — and ensure produce is not from genetically modified seeds — in order to use the organic label.
They're worried about contamination which can happen when the pollen spreads or seeds escape.
Most of the soybeans and corn now grown in the U.S. sprout from seeds that were genetically modified to be pesticide resistant and there's ongoing research about how pesticide-resistant genetically modified organisms (GMOs) led to so-called super weeds and bugs, and less biodiversity.
|
|
|
|