[mikemhg]

I'm not saying that at all.

Who would think this wasn't planned? I don't see anyone making that argument, of course it was planned, one could never coordinate such an attack without planning.

My issue is with the details, specifically the Israeli government alleging dozens of baby beheadings without any proof or substantiation of that. I fully believe that is propaganda, you do realize that states tend to use flagrant allegations as a means of winning the war of perception with the public?

The same way during the infancy of the Ukraine/Russia war where both parties accused each other of their soldiers raping women. Why? Because it makes the other side look much worse.

Obviously Hamas killed some children. I'm sure the answer lies somewhere in the middle, some were shot, some might've died by other means (grenades, etc.). No way am I saying that's acceptable.

My question is why is it when an Israeli child is killed it's time to pearl clutch, but if thousands of more children are killed by dropping bombs on Gaza, it's par for the course?

Why is one fine, but the other is not?