[unit]

Originally Posted by Hehe

I want to point out, this is not a source I trusted. I merely pointed out that Supa was actually supporting my very point with a source that he thought proved his point.

But I think this is what happened.

He saw my post about Reps always cleaning up after Dems, went batshit crazy in disbelief, and googled "which US parties had higher inflation?" or something along that line as a rebuttal.

He then saw the first sentence "Blinder and Watson found that since 1945 the average inflation rate was higher under Republican presidents than under Democrats" then he jizzed and came back to call me a lying shit bag thinking that he found the perfect evidence.

I kept using that because that very source he used, the Wikipedia page said the very thing I said originally, where Reps are usually Dems' mess cleaner.

No apology anywhere even though I pointed out that the very source he used to call me a "lying shit bag" proved my very point.

So again, read instead of just taking points to support your argument/narrative.

if you're going to quote that source in an argument against someone else (me) then you are taking ownership of that source. you can't have it both ways.