|
Personally, I don't think Turd did anything inappropriate by first engaging PeePee -- publically or privately -- to urge him to obtain security access to these briefings so that he can clean house on his own. As a start, this should be a Conservative Party matter, because if Turd just releases the names of these Conservative parliamentarians, he would 100% get accused of playing politics.
I view PeePee as being entirely in the wrong for continually refusing to obtain security access to view these intelligence briefing. He just wants to claim plausible deniability if/when shxt hits the fan. He is also dodging his responsibility as the Conservative Party leader, because as the party leader, he needs to be the one to clean house if there are internal party issues. But he is deliberately not doing that. My guess is, he doesn't want to lose voter support from those who support these questionable candidates, so he is deliberately not taking any action to clean house, or allow him to clean house.
But at this point, Turd should just release the names of these questionable candidates. The info is coming from CSIS, not Turd or the Liberals party, and CSIS is supposed to be non-partisian. If/When Turd really does that, PeePee would 100% accuse him of lying / making false accusation to damage his colleagues and his party's reputation, even though he is taunting Turd to release the names now.
Gosh I really hate PeePee's guts.
|