Quote:
Originally Posted by supafamous
What exactly was the "disaster" with the rollout? We had a life threatening illness that was causing massive impacts across the economy and society and we needed to do a mass rollout as quickly as we could with a vaccine that used a new technology (mRNA).
Forcing people into a corner was the right thing to do. And people doing "unbiased research" - yeah, lol, sure. That's tinfoil hat talk.
|
life threatening illness
Bruh.
COVID was deadly mainly for the elderly.
IFR under 70: 0.05–0.1% (Dr. Ioannidis, WHO)
Under 40? 0.003% — lower than dying in a car crash or being struck by lightning (1 in 1.2 million/year, NOAA).
Pfizer’s own trial data (released by court order):
1,223 deaths and 42,000+ adverse events in 90 days.
Cleveland Clinic (2023): infection risk increased with each mRNA dose.
JAMA & NEJM: Myocarditis risk up to 28x higher in young men.
Basel study: 100% showed heart cell damage post-shot.
This wasn’t "safe or effective" for healthy young people...it was coerced.