View Single Post
Old 01-27-2026, 01:36 PM   #291
EvoFire
Los Bastardo owned my ass at least once
 
EvoFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,210
Thanked 4,946 Times in 2,290 Posts
Failed 75 Times in 49 Posts
So back on topic.

I did my Dexa today and it came back at 24.8% body fat, which is within expectation for me as I was guesstimating 25-28%.

I'm below average for all metrics (towards negative side of the scale) but within range. Only outlier for me was bone density which took me by surprise a little.

Here's where I have certain reservations. On the image included I could very clearly see between my legs it was reading my scrunched up shorts as fat. I already chose a less baggy pair of shorts but it still read like that. I also have questions on how well calibrated the machine is as I am of the mind that this is like a dyno for a car. Every machine is going to read differently and it probably isn't good idea to compare your results across different machines.

Another bit I thought was interesting was it read me as 162lbs. On a scale I weigh in at 172 (yesterday at the gym) with shoes and a sweater and my phone. Even if you take everything off I'm not carrying 10lbs of dead weight, maybe 5lbs. My friend who went with me registered 4-5lbs below his scale weight, but I think he weighs at home without shoes. So the DEXA scan is reading about 5lbs avg below a typical scale.

At first we were like, we'll do this again in a year. But we might do it in a shorter time frame. They said they are looking to open one around Brentwood soon so hopefully less sketchy part of town.

So while I have the mentality of taking the data with a bit of salt, I think I am going to focus on bone density as it's a strong determination of health as I age.
EvoFire is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: