| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 |
03-30-2010, 02:07 PM
|
#1
|
|
My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 88 Posts
|
Driving impression of E92 M3 Vert
This past weekend, my buddy let me borrow his E92 M3 Vert. This is my impression of the car;
Power - to be frank, off the line it felt extremely soft and weak. No real power until 2500rpms. My 550i is faster from 0-30mph. Once the revs build past 3K, the motor pulls pretty strongly, but still seems pretty weak for a 414hp car. The extra weight from the hardtop really makes this M3 sluggish. I was really disappointed with the acceleration Vs a coupe/sedan. I guess you cannot expect too much from a high revving 4L motor mated to a 4000lbs car.
Handling/Steering - at 6/10s the car felt amazingly planted and turn in was super direct. At 8/10s, the car felt like a pig, you can feel the understeer and sheer weight being thrown into a turn.
Chassis - still can feel the windshield frame shake over bumps. I thought the E92 chassis would be strong enough to elimnate this. The hardtop is too kool though, however, with the amount of moving parts, I would be scared to own this thing in 5yrs.
Looks - the car looks pretty sexy. This is definitely not I car you can pick your nose in, gets allot of attention from young boys and girls.
Sound - even stock it sounds really aggressive, got love a high revving short stroke V8.
Tranny - the 7sp dual clutch is lighthing fast, but is boring as hell. 6sp manual all the way!
Overall, the car costs $98K before taxes. Very nice car imo, but not worth $98K. My buddy and I both thought the M3 was a very kool car, but for our wives. Not a true guy's performance car.
I love bimmers, but this one really let me down. If you want a convertible get a 335i with a Dinan tune and call it a day.
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 02:24 PM
|
#2
|
|
Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: internet
Posts: 818
Thanked 406 Times in 127 Posts
Failed 413 Times in 103 Posts
|
Perhaps try the e92 next time?
The e93 is known to be a bit soft and heavy.
Posted via RS Mobile
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 02:41 PM
|
#3
|
|
Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mid-levels, HK
Posts: 913
Thanked 1,336 Times in 198 Posts
Failed 1,266 Times in 145 Posts
|
if i remember correctly the e93 weights more than the m5 if not very close
also yeah i saw a lot of girls driving the e9x m3 nowadys... its turning into a chicks car
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 03:09 PM
|
#4
|
|
nuggets mod
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 7,073
Thanked 3,962 Times in 996 Posts
Failed 178 Times in 60 Posts
|
There's just something about the shape of the roof line on the e93s that throws me off. the coupes look so much better.
__________________
I searched for truth, and all I found was You
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 04:06 PM
|
#5
|
|
NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 34
Thanked 24 Times in 7 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
e92 vert??!?! does it exist?
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 04:29 PM
|
#6
|
|
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rawr
Posts: 927
Thanked 1,324 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 132 Times in 58 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freakshow
There's just something about the shape of the roof line on the e93s that throws me off. the coupes look so much better.
|
QFT. the e93 looks weiiiirrrddd compared to the e92...
also heard that the Getrag 7spd DCT ain't that great either. lurches when downshifting at low speeds. if you're gonna get an M3, better stick to a manual like a true man should
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 07:53 PM
|
#7
|
|
Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: burnaby
Posts: 444
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 11:38 PM
|
#8
|
|
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bc
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 119 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 28 Posts
|
Most of your opinion is so true except that I still find it sluggish above 3000rpm (that's with 6 speed vert). I thought the car is slow-ish compare to my SMG vert. That's why my wife drives the SMG and I'm back into the SUV.
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 AM.
|