REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2022, 01:15 PM   #4701
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,185
Thanked 5,298 Times in 2,013 Posts
Failed 265 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
Indirectly, it does for many states as they revert back to laws that were superseded by Roe v Wade.



Lol, You've never heard of the filibuster? You should read up on how that works, and why the Dems don't actually "control" the senate because of it.
I was going to post this but you beat me to it.

Hehe loves to argue about things he has little knowledge on, but alas.
Advertisement
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 01:20 PM   #4702
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,185
Thanked 5,298 Times in 2,013 Posts
Failed 265 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
I will give you a local example. Why do we have this fucked up RE market with seemingly no law passing to curve it even it's so out of touch with average income? It's because true RE market curving policies are not popular.
Wait... What?
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 01:20 PM   #4703
linguistic ninja
 
CivicBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 16,116
Thanked 3,811 Times in 1,386 Posts
Failed 141 Times in 80 Posts
LOL leave it up to hehe to turn a women's rights - nay HUMAN rights - issue into an Ayn Randian rant about how people don't deserve a living wage. Jesus fucking christ.
__________________
http://www.en.wikipedia.org

Still a card carrying member of the SFC :)
CivicBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 01:35 PM   #4704
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
Indirectly, it does for many states as they revert back to laws that were superseded by Roe v Wade.



Lol, You've never heard of the filibuster? You should read up on how that works, and why the Dems don't actually "control" the senate because of it.
The Supreme Court doesn’t have the power to create law. It merely interprets and enforce it to the letters.

I find it almost comical for people, especially legislators to blame Supreme Court for hurting human rights. If they are so serious about it, they can change laws to whatever so that there will only be one way for SCOTUS to interpret it. Even amend the constitution to have abortion and whatever else they want to add to.

But no… it’s the SCOTUS, it’s them messing things up when they are just doing their job.

Oh, I forgot. The speciality of lefties. Blame the riches, the society, and the SCOTUS, it’s never them the problem.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 01:54 PM   #4705
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemhg View Post
Wait... What?
If you know a thing or two about RE market, you know the problem why our market is so out of touch with average income is because of speculation.

There are laws in countries like Germany and Norway to limit speculation in the form of taxes. So if our government is truly serious about making housing affordable, why not outlaw speculation? Make it so that any property owned less than 5yrs would have 100% capital gain tax. You kill any profit in speculation, you kill speculation itself.

But no. It’s always something else. It’s the foreigners. It’s Airbnb. Blah blah blah. Why not just say the real reason out loud? You suckers should stop profiting from the RE market.

I’ll tell you why, because they will lose a lot of votes. That’s why.

Again, it’s the majority’s decision. Not the right decision. If it were up to me, I’ll kill all speculation at once.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 02:59 PM   #4706
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,555
Thanked 32,178 Times in 7,481 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
Comparing expensive houses to controlling a woman’s body is fucking hilarious.
You get to vote on policy, not human rights. It’s honestly impressive that the comparison got even dumber than the vaccine argument.
On another note, there is rumblings of capital punishment in Texas for abortions with a recent bill that was tabled. So fucking pro life that you will kill someone over a clump of cells that is not sentient.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 03:28 PM   #4707
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,570
Thanked 5,008 Times in 1,848 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
But no… it’s the SCOTUS, it’s them messing things up when they are just doing their job.
.
No one was asking them to make this decision at this time. There was no current petition or case before the court. They literally just came out of left field with this. Not to mention the ones who outright LIED in their confirmation hearings, saying that they considered the matter settled precedent:


This is just straight up right-wing politics playing out what is supposed to be an impartial institution. Fucking joke.

Thank fuck we live in Canada.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 04:14 PM   #4708
Performance Moderator
 
68style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,586
Thanked 17,239 Times in 5,759 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 187 Posts
We're begrudgingly talking about why the majority vote isn't even a concept in most US states due to unfair access to voting... but somehow we're also talking about Vancouver RE prices and minimum wage laws? With massive assumptions being taken on where people advocating for abortions stand on both those issues?

My head is spinning lol
68style is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 04:29 PM   #4709
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,185
Thanked 5,298 Times in 2,013 Posts
Failed 265 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
If you know a thing or two about RE market, you know the problem why our market is so out of touch with average income is because of speculation.

There are laws in countries like Germany and Norway to limit speculation in the form of taxes. So if our government is truly serious about making housing affordable, why not outlaw speculation? Make it so that any property owned less than 5yrs would have 100% capital gain tax. You kill any profit in speculation, you kill speculation itself.

But no. It’s always something else. It’s the foreigners. It’s Airbnb. Blah blah blah. Why not just say the real reason out loud? You suckers should stop profiting from the RE market.

I’ll tell you why, because they will lose a lot of votes. That’s why.

Again, it’s the majority’s decision. Not the right decision. If it were up to me, I’ll kill all speculation at once.
I suppose you've never heard of lobbying have you?

Do you not see what the NDP government in BC are attempting to do to curb prices on RE? Even the federal Liberals are attempting to put forward initiatives to address these market issues. The majority of Canadians support such changes, even the Conservative party has been pandering the idea, the problem is lobbying and inherent corruption, not public opinion.

It's the same idea that the majority of Americans support the opening of generic drugs and regulations on drug pricing -- yet not a single elected government has been able to address these problems through legislation.

Very rarely does the court of public opinion match what government can and will do.

How you don't understand that baffles me.
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 04:41 PM   #4710
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,185
Thanked 5,298 Times in 2,013 Posts
Failed 265 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
The Supreme Court doesn’t have the power to create law. It merely interprets and enforce it to the letters.

I find it almost comical for people, especially legislators to blame Supreme Court for hurting human rights. If they are so serious about it, they can change laws to whatever so that there will only be one way for SCOTUS to interpret it. Even amend the constitution to have abortion and whatever else they want to add to.

But no… it’s the SCOTUS, it’s them messing things up when they are just doing their job.

Oh, I forgot. The speciality of lefties. Blame the riches, the society, and the SCOTUS, it’s never them the problem.
You're still wrong.

The constitution contains a number of provisions of unenumerated rights that aren't explicitly stated.

Specific to the Roe v Wade opinion it should be found within the Due Process Clause -- which says no one should be denied liberty without due process.

You can't simply parrot the constitution as it's written with ambiguities that are still being argued to this day, it carries rights in which we accept today, but are not explicitly stated. The Second Amendment never explicitly indicates that you can buy a bazooka or machine gun, but here we are, it has been an accepted basis.

You're parroting bullshit rightwing garbage about the constitution that is completely facetious in its intent.

A bad faith argument, plain and simple.
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 04:43 PM   #4711
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,680
Thanked 9,370 Times in 4,077 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
On another note, there is rumblings of capital punishment in Texas for abortions with a recent bill that was tabled. So fucking pro life that you will kill someone over a clump of cells that is not sentient.
If that's the case then if the pregnancy is from a rape then they have nothing to lose by killing their rapist.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 04:44 PM   #4712
linguistic ninja
 
CivicBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 16,116
Thanked 3,811 Times in 1,386 Posts
Failed 141 Times in 80 Posts
I'm so sick of crime, dirty streets, traffic and dumb bitches getting all up in my face. Why can't the government do anything about that?

Damn I guess it's cause the majority wants it that way!
__________________
http://www.en.wikipedia.org

Still a card carrying member of the SFC :)
CivicBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 05:30 PM   #4713
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicBlues View Post
I'm so sick of crime, dirty streets, traffic and dumb bitches getting all up in my face. Why can't the government do anything about that?

Damn I guess it's cause the majority wants it that way!
It’s personal freedom. It’s their choice to be on the street. We shouldn’t force people to go work hard, be a contributing part of the society. It should be a right for illegal immigrants to do nothing. We should take care of them. They should be able to make their own choices.

That’s California or any liberal dominant states for you right now.

And yes, that’s what the majority wants. They just never thought about the consequences. Which are the ones you just complained about
__________________
Nothing for now

Last edited by Hehe; 05-05-2022 at 06:03 PM.
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 05:37 PM   #4714
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,555
Thanked 32,178 Times in 7,481 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore View Post
If that's the case then if the pregnancy is from a rape then they have nothing to lose by killing their rapist.
Luckily I’m not pro life so you can start killing rapists by the droves and I’ll be throwing parties about it.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 05:46 PM   #4715
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemhg View Post
You're still wrong.

The constitution contains a number of provisions of unenumerated rights that aren't explicitly stated.

Specific to the Roe v Wade opinion it should be found within the Due Process Clause -- which says no one should be denied liberty without due process.

You can't simply parrot the constitution as it's written with ambiguities that are still being argued to this day, it carries rights in which we accept today, but are not explicitly stated. The Second Amendment never explicitly indicates that you can buy a bazooka or machine gun, but here we are, it has been an accepted basis.

You're parroting bullshit rightwing garbage about the constitution that is completely facetious in its intent.

A bad faith argument, plain and simple.
But can you suggest att what point should the SCOTUS draw a line? I agree that the constitution is written with ambiguity and purposely so. And it’s up to the SCOTUS to determine the final say on how far the ambiguity goes and clarify what exactly The constitution cover. And today, they are doing exactly that.

They determined (at least from Justice Alito’s draft) that the original Roe vs Wade brought more questions than it tried to answer. And the fact that the original constitution never intended to cover a topic that at the time, they had no way to even comprehend. So, they found that it’s not explicitly covered by the constitution, and is therefore not a part of constitution problem but each state or federal legislature should bring forward their own version of laws governing abortion. Just like we have laws governing narcotics and whatnot. You can’t simply say that using drugs is your personal freedom and prohibiting such is a breach of constitutional right. Using drugs were never covered by the constitution. And thus, if federal or state legislature passed laws to regulate it. It’s ok because use of drugs is not a constitutional right and it’s up to finer laws to govern its usage. They are doing exactly that with abortion. It’s not part of constitution. So, if anyone (state in this case) wants to write laws to govern it, it’s ok and it’s not a SCOTUS problem.

Again, I’m pro abortion. I’m just arguing that the SCOTUS is doing nothing wrong for the purpose that they want the SCOTUS to function. If anything, it’sa great time to be bringing appropriate laws for abortion. So there’s no more ambiguity with it. But the Dems would never do that. They will just use this as a topic to attack the Republican.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 06:01 PM   #4716
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
Comparing expensive houses to controlling a woman’s body is fucking hilarious.
You get to vote on policy, not human rights. It’s honestly impressive that the comparison got even dumber than the vaccine argument.
On another note, there is rumblings of capital punishment in Texas for abortions with a recent bill that was tabled. So fucking pro life that you will kill someone over a clump of cells that is not sentient.
Shelter is basic human needs. I don’t get where you are coming with this. So you think it’s ok for the RE market to go out of control, zero rent control and RTB regulations because it’s nothing personal?
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 06:15 PM   #4717
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,555
Thanked 32,178 Times in 7,481 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
No I don’t think it’s ok, but it’s not comparable to body autonomy. Besides you’ve clearly stated that poor people don’t deserve things anyways so what fucking point are you trying to make?
One post you’ll say poor people don’t deserve help because it doesn’t align with capitalism, but the next you would smash any possible profitability in the housing market?
I’m down with any and all measures to absolutely crush real estate profits, but arguments about the economy aren’t to do with this.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 10:10 PM   #4718
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
I didn't say they don't deserve help. I said they too need to make the effort when seeking for help by actually taking the proactive role in becoming better.

Whenever it comes to social assistance, I've always maintained a single approach: teach them how to fish, not give them fish.

But many of the poor want none of that... show me the benjamins or nothing.

So, I only ask one thing for Social programs for the poor... teach them how to fish or have programs that fish would only be provided if certain criteria of improvements are met... if they only want the fish and none of the hassle? I'm sorry... they need to do better.

Now, back to the original discussion. How is it not comparable to body autonomy? By having a skyhigh RE market, we basically pushed many away from our city (freedom of mobility, you can't stay here if you got no money). And of those who stayed, they either benefited from this market or industry, or they are scared shitless to ever lose their job because they are pushed to the limit financially.

People don't realize it... but so much freedom is lost and sacrifices are made to live in Vancouver except for the super-wealthy. There is absolutely no reason why a waterfront house in South America costs 500k when here is 5M (if you could find one for that much). If anything, their beaches and weather are better than ours.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 10:41 PM   #4719
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,429
Thanked 7,629 Times in 3,585 Posts
Failed 1,506 Times in 644 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
I didn't say they don't deserve help. I said they too need to make the effort when seeking for help by actually taking the proactive role in becoming better.
approach: teach them how to fish, not give them fish.
so teach us wise one.
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 11:05 PM   #4720
Performance Moderator
 
68style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,586
Thanked 17,239 Times in 5,759 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 187 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
There is absolutely no reason why a waterfront house in South America costs 500k when here is 5M (if you could find one for that much). If anything, their beaches and weather are better than ours.
I’m somewhat onboard with the incentivized benefits idea…

But this part of what you said? This is wild haha

I mean really?? No reason at all? I’ve argued myself why not, say, Hawaii for $3M instead of East Van… but there’s a severe drop off in safety, opportunity, right to due process and life expectancy in South America. If I remember correctly you know this full well I think you have either lived in or have experience in Brazil. Unless you’re talking about having already made massive $ here and flexing it down there to buy a quality of life and rights as a person that comes automatically just by existing here?
68style is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-05-2022, 11:19 PM   #4721
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! View Post
so teach us wise one.
Nothing needs to be taught... just the policies need to be promoting long lasting improvements.

If someone needs a clean place to stay so he/she can clean up and get a job, gov't should do like capsule hotels like in Japan so they can have a base for a fresh start.

If someone has disability/other problems that makes it hard to find a job, gov't should organize programs that require basic skills with subsidize wage. This way, the person can either become better at that job and grow into something else, or if everything fails, have a dignified living that he/she is working to maintain themselves.

For those who can't work at all, provide basic housing (again, capsule hotel?) with some basic support assuming they can meet certain requirements (stay sober, drug free, learning opportunities that give them educational credits... etc)

Again... nothing out of the ordinary and just throwing ideas. The concept is simple, just provide incentives or assistance for private/public sector to get these people in need back on track with life. Let them understand nothing is free in life. They are free to choose the lifestyle they live in, but if they want gov't assistance, they need to get on a program that either improves them or makes sure they stay out of trouble.

Right now, we are basically just giving out money with no expectation for any improvement from them. This has to change. For the better of themselves and society.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 11:24 PM   #4722
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,788
Thanked 2,874 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 619 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68style View Post
I’m somewhat onboard with the incentivized benefits idea…

But this part of what you said? This is wild haha

I mean really?? No reason at all? I’ve argued myself why not, say, Hawaii for $3M instead of East Van… but there’s a severe drop off in safety, opportunity, right to due process and life expectancy in South America. If I remember correctly you know this full well I think you have either lived in or have experience in Brazil. Unless you’re talking about having already made massive $ here and flexing it down there to buy a quality of life and rights as a person that comes automatically just by existing here?
I do commercial RE research and development for a living and have been in the field for almost 3 decades as I started out with my parents when they didn't speak the language very well and I handled many aspects with them.

So, I know a thing or two about how to value a property. And no... taking everything into consideration, there's no reason that's enough to justify a waterfront house in Van is 10x or more of a waterfront house in a very nice area in central/south America.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 11:40 PM   #4723
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,923
Thanked 6,657 Times in 2,682 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
Unfortunately, I'd have to disagree with Great68's suggestion that the anti-abortion movement in the US came out of the left field. The Texas abortion laws that sparked the current controlversy has been going on for a least a few months. More importantly, there has always been a pretty strong anti-abortion movement in the US that seems to be very well organized, and they have been consistently chipping away at Roe v. Wade, or at least trying their hardest to do so.

On the note about confirmation hearings, if you pay careful attention to the way these sleazebag justices were wording their sentences (from the YouTube video you showed), they deliberately chose their words to basically mean absolutely nothing, and offered no guarantees to the continued enshrining of Roe v. Wade. All they said at best was Roe w. Wade will be used as a precedence just like another other precedence. Kavanaugh merely mentioned an established fact -- that Roe has been re-affirmed many times over the past 45 years -- he was stating a fact that was true at the time, and that should never have been interpreted as his own personal opinion or what he has planned on doing. Amy Coney Barrett pointed out that there was a lot of questions about Roe, and that indicated Roe was not something that has been settled.

I'm going to say that I lean more towards pro-life than pro-choice, but with the way Roe is heading in the US, you are damn right that thank fuck we live in Canada...

(though I do wonder whether / how long the same stupidity will make its way up to Canada here... )
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
No one was asking them to make this decision at this time. There was no current petition or case before the court. They literally just came out of left field with this. Not to mention the ones who outright LIED in their confirmation hearings, saying that they considered the matter settled precedent:

This is just straight up right-wing politics playing out what is supposed to be an impartial institution. Fucking joke.

Thank fuck we live in Canada.
Traum is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-06-2022, 12:55 AM   #4724
Performance Moderator
 
68style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,586
Thanked 17,239 Times in 5,759 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 187 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
So, I know a thing or two about how to value a property. And no... taking everything into consideration, there's no reason that's enough to justify a waterfront house in Van is 10x or more of a waterfront house in a very nice area in central/south America.
Well... I mean no disrespect... but literally the entire world disagrees with you then? They voted with their $... if they all thought it was so great down there, RE prices would be just as high as here
68style is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2022, 07:02 AM   #4725
My homepage has been set to RS
 
sdubfid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: AB/BC
Posts: 2,223
Thanked 1,207 Times in 386 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
Nothing needs to be taught... just the policies need to be promoting long lasting improvements.

If someone needs a clean place to stay so he/she can clean up and get a job, gov't should do like capsule hotels like in Japan so they can have a base for a fresh start.

If someone has disability/other problems that makes it hard to find a job, gov't should organize programs that require basic skills with subsidize wage. This way, the person can either become better at that job and grow into something else, or if everything fails, have a dignified living that he/she is working to maintain themselves.

For those who can't work at all, provide basic housing (again, capsule hotel?) with some basic support assuming they can meet certain requirements (stay sober, drug free, learning opportunities that give them educational credits... etc)

Again... nothing out of the ordinary and just throwing ideas. The concept is simple, just provide incentives or assistance for private/public sector to get these people in need back on track with life. Let them understand nothing is free in life. They are free to choose the lifestyle they live in, but if they want gov't assistance, they need to get on a program that either improves them or makes sure they stay out of trouble.

Right now, we are basically just giving out money with no expectation for any improvement from them. This has to change. For the better of themselves and society.
I agree with the teach to fish not give them fish analogy. But it won’t happen because of lazy human nature. The majority is going to vote for who gives them the most free stuff without realizing that it’s an overall loss to them. Look back to when COVID first started. It was less than 1 week before people were asking for handouts and the government started opening the taps. Look where that got us with massive inflation. This is the reason not everyone is a millionaire with a six pack. We aren’t taught basic finance in school. School is just prepping you to become a corporate slave for 40 years to feed the government.

I disagree that the real estate market is where it is at due to flipping. I think the root cause is due to lax financing rules. I am single income and banks will give me millions of dollars. This is not good but I am going to make the most of it, if it’s being offered to me. As an example if you bought a house for 500k (5% down 25k) and it increased to 1 million. You can then refinance and take out ~$325,000. You can then buy 3 more $500,000 homes with 20% down in lower cost cities. So effectively you now own 4 homes all for $25,000.
__________________
They/them
69 Camaro LS/T56
sdubfid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net